rsadelle: (Default)
[personal profile] rsadelle
So, I run this list. It's not the only Metallica slash out there. There are people on metslash who aren't on the list that dare not speak its name, and vice versa. There are some people on both lists. Most of the people who are no mail and/or lurkers on metslash are on both lists. Most of the people who post fic are only on metslash.

Every time I remind people about our archiving policies, I remind them that crossposting is okay. It is possible to post a fic to a list without granting archiving permission. I know that some of the people on both lists are writers. I know that some of them are extremely good writers. I know that they've posted fic to the other list. And yet, with the exception of one author and one story by a second author, none of them post to metslash.

Why not?

Is it because we don't automatically jump up and down and say, "Oh, you're so wonderful, that was the best story ever, when are you writing the sequel?" to every piece of fic that gets posted? Is it because I actually dare to say what I don't like about fic? I only wish someone would critique my fic the way I've critiqued other people's fic. Well, the more recent stuff anyway; I know just how bad some of my older fic is. Isn't that far more useful to you as a writer than unconditional praise for every word you write?

Or perhaps, like one person who recently unsubbed, they don't like it that I dare say that I don't like some of the writing and list policies of the other list. Apparently the fact that all three S's and various other people from the other list have said extremely negative things about metslash and me in their journals and journal comments is completely irrelevant.

Not that I'm bitter.

Bitter? Us?

Date: 2001-04-26 06:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minette.livejournal.com
I love that whole 'tread carefully lest we say something that someone doesn't like or agree with' mentality that seems to exist in certain RPS fandoms, most noticeably in Metallica. Heaven forbid that we dare to say something that goes against the established mindset of the fandom. Besides, we all know that we're supposed to only think what other people think and, if the listmom says it, then it must be true.

I think critiquing a story--pointing out what works and what doesn't, and why it does or does not--is one of the most valuable things a writer can get. I like getting the 'it was great' comments, but I value the 'this was good, but this would have been better' comments as well. How can I improve my writing skills if I don't know what I did wrong?

As for criticizing the other list, well, we all know that it's wrong and mean to say anything negative about their writing or policies. After all, we should all be nice to them and just agree with everything they say and can't we all just get along?

And despite the many epithets hurled at metslash and you, we should all remember that they just criticized the writing, not us personally, she said sarcastically. I mean, it's not like they called everyone who moved to metslash 'crones', or referred to you as a 'bitch', and inferred that you were leading me around by the nose, or anything of that nature.

Why, I do believe that I am not bitter along with you. How fun.

Profile

rsadelle: (Default)
Ruth Sadelle Alderson

Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags