rsadelle: (Default)
Spoilers )

I'm invested enough now to read the third book, but unless it's absolutely amazing, I probably wouldn't read more of Tamsyn Muir's work. I do recommend reading the books as ebooks, because then you can easily satisfy your curiosity about the meaning of the eighty bajillion death-related words by clicking on them for a definition. I genuinely thought I had a very broad vocabulary, and yet apparently I do not, at least when it comes to death.
rsadelle: (Default)
I read 64 books in 2018, which means I read more than my goal of one book a week. Only six of them were books I re-read, which is my lowest re-read percentage in years.

Top 5 fiction books I read for the first time in 2018

Girls Made of Snow and Glass by Melissa Bashardoust - Queer YA fairy tale retelling. It's a really well built story, there's queer identity discovery that's organically built into the larger story, and the solution of the ending was everything I wanted.

Far From the Tree by Robin Benway - If you like crying over feelings about families, adoption, and learning to let people in, this excellent YA novel is for you.

The Passion of Dolssa by Julie Berry - Historical YA about a female mystic and the people trying to protect her from the Inquisition in 13th century southern France. Totally engrossing, and heavy on strong female friendship.

The Good House by Tananarive Due - Small town supernatural/horror that I couldn't put down. I've thought about the ending off and on since I read it in September. Content notes for all kinds of supernatural, physical, and sexual violence.

The Lie Tree by Frances Hardinge - Really excellent Victorian era science-related YA murder mystery with a potentially supernatural element and feminist themes.

Top 2 non-fiction books I read in 2018

Priestdaddy by Patricia Lockwood - This memoir made me laugh out loud, cry, and marvel at her use of language.

The Prodigal Tongue: The Love-Hate Relationship Between American and British English by Lynne Murphy - Hilarious, informative, and well-sourced. I also highly recommend her blog, which I've been reading for over a decade.

Top 5 books I read and then thought about a lot in 2018

The Girl in the Road by Monica Byrne - I finished this book and thought, "Huh, weird." It was very well-written and engrossing, and it had some really interesting ideas in it that I keep thinking about. Content notes for murder and sexual violence.

The Precious One by Marisa de los Santos - One of the alternating viewpoint characters is a naive teenage girl being groomed for abuse by a predatory teacher, which is obvious to the reader but not the character and very uncomfortable to read. The book, like her others, is very well-written, and I did keep thinking about it.

The Leavers by Lisa Ko - I thought it was really well written, and I liked the ending, but I didn't enjoy reading it. It was very unsentimental and pretty grim in parts. I have thought about it a lot since I read it.

The Last Hundred Years Trilogy (Some Luck, Early Warning, and Golden Age) by Jane Smiley - I read this entire trilogy, which follows a family through a century, in a week. I read the first one for my general interest, not sci fi, book club, and I was not expecting the last book to include a realistic, grim climate change apocalypse theme. I've thought about that aspect, as well as the various family member's stories, especially Henry's, off and on since I read it.

A Gift Upon the Shore by M.K. Wren - This is an older post-apocalyptic novel, which means the apocalypse is nuclear warfare instead of climate change. I'm not sure I quite bought the unquestioning nature of the premise of the story, but I did think about it a lot and we had an interesting book club discussion about it.
rsadelle: (Default)
I sometimes read things from Longreads' picks, which is how I got to this interview with Carmen Maria Machado, which was interesting enough that I requested her collection of stories, Her Body and Other Parties, from the library. The book is weird and intense and probably not for everyone. (I'm not sure it was for me.) It requires a lot of content warnings that I can't possibly remember enough details to give you, so google for them if that's something you're concerned about. I did get to the end of the book, then read the acknowledgments, and find that her list of teachers to thank includes Cass*ndra Cl*re, so if people who think positive things about her is your line, you may want to avoid this book.

If you choose to read the book, I recommend reading it in bits and pieces instead of gulping down the whole thing in a few hours like I did - I think it would benefit from some mental space between stories. I read it last weekend, and looking at the table of contents now, I can't remember specific about some of the stories, and there are only eight of them.

Of the eight stories, I thought there were two standouts. One is the also available for free online "Especially Heinous: 272 Views of Law & Order SVU," which is weird, paranormal SVU fic told in fictional episode blurbs. I couldn't put it down. The other is "The Resident," which is a narrative by a writer about her time at a writing residency. It's really the ending that I loved. I won't spoil it for you, but I will say that I keep thinking about how brilliant it was.

If you're into weird, feminist, queer literature with a paranormal/horror bent, this book is probably be for you.
rsadelle: (Default)
When I mentioned that I loved Jacqueline Carey's Santa Olivia, two different friends suggested I try out the Kushiel's Legacy series. I'd heard of them before, at a Wiscon kink panel where I remember somebody disliking some aspect of them, which is part of why I'd never read them. But with recommendations from friends, I went to the library and picked up the first book. Then the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth. I had to pause in the middle to read Saints Astray, which came in on interlibrary loan, and there was another pause at the end as I had to wait for the ninth book to arrive, also on interlibrary loan.

Spoilers/Review )

If you're into sex positive epic fantasy novels and twists on European history and theology, I definitely recommend at least the first two trilogies. If you're interested in sex scenes and kink, I recommend you find something else to read.
rsadelle: (Default)
I loved Santa Olivia so much that I promptly put in an interlibrary loan request for the sequel, Saints Astray. Again, I don't have a lot to say about it. If you liked Santa Olivia, you'll probably also like Saints Astray. If you didn't read Santa Olivia, Saints Astray might stand alone, but you'll miss the backstory. Review/mild spoilers )
rsadelle: (Default)
I read Santa Olivia without knowing anything about it based on a strong recommendation from [livejournal.com profile] allegram, and I'm very glad I listened to her. I don't have much to say about it. It has a semi-dystopian feel with a female superhero of sorts, it has destined for each other type romances (fangirls and others who like werewolf mating stories will probably like it), and it has a supportive community around the main character.

There are two things I didn't like about the book, enough to make them worth mentioning. First of all, the lesbian sex is much less explicit than the heterosexual sex. I was actually surprised by the explicitness of the heterosexual sex given that I'm pretty sure I've seen the book on YA shelves at Barnes & Noble, and then disappointed that the lesbian sex scenes didn't receive equal treatment. Secondly, Carey uses "could of," "would of," and "should of." Unless she and her editor are completely incompetent - which is not a theory supported by the rest of the book - that's a deliberate style choice, and I found it annoying.
rsadelle: (Default)
I read about M+O 4EVR in a [livejournal.com profile] 50books_poc review that made a point not to spoil it. I went and read the summary at Amazon so I would be spoiled, and then put off reading it because I thought it was likely to be the kind of YA novel that would make me cry. I didn't cry and other spoilers. )
rsadelle: (Default)
I had high hopes for Malinda Lo's Adaptation. Ash and Huntress were very good with the potential to be great, and I was hoping Lo would be one of those writers who really learns to write by the third book. I did read Adaptation in one quick sitting, but I was disappointed in it, and more so the more I think about it.

Summary )

The basic structural problem with the book is the same as the problem with Ash and Huntress: the story Lo seems to be setting up and the story she tells at the end are not the same story. Spoilers/Review )

I will probably read the sequel when it's published because this was such a fast read, and because the aliens, at least, won't be an unwelcome surprise. I might even like it better because I won't go into it with such high hopes.

I do have a copy of the book, so if anyone wants to read it for themselves, let me know and I will send it to you.
rsadelle: (Default)
Last year when I asked for lesbian fiction suggestions, one friend highly recommended Sarah Waters' Tipping the Velvet. I'd heard of Tipping the Velvet, but it never sounded interesting to me, and [livejournal.com profile] inlovewithnight had just read it, and the things she didn't like about it (spoilers in her post) made me think I wouldn't like it either. Then the friend who recommended it gave me a copy for my birthday, with the note that even if I ended up not liking it, she thought I should own it.

I took the book - and nothing else to read - with me when I went for jury duty in March, and read the first 48 pages while waiting to be called to a courtroom. Then it went back into the stack of unread books. When I was on vacation in August, I saw a recommendation for it in an independent bookstore that said the sex scenes were hot, so yesterday I finally went back to it and flipped through to find just those parts. One of them is hot, and the others are okay.

I didn't like the book for basically the same reasons I didn't think I was going to: first, because I don't like literary fiction, and secondly, because I don't like historical fiction about queer characters based on real history. I think it's the literary fiction aspect that was the most annoying one to me in this book; nothing in the world can make me care about that much detail about oyster-parlours. Yesterday's skim of the rest of the book somewhat allayed my fears about it as historical fiction; the bad things that happen to Nan aren't quite as dire or as historically-bound as I would have been anxious about. I did pretty much laugh at the ending, though, in which spoilers. )

Anyway, a lot of people have loved Tipping the Velvet, and the writing in the part I read wasn't bad in a technical sense, so if it sounds like your sort of thing, you might like it. If you dislike the kinds of things I dislike, you probably won't like it.

It's been almost a year since my friend gave me the book and I've made a sincere effort to read it, so I feel justified in getting rid of it now. If anyone wants my copy, let me know. If no one claims it in a week, it's going on PaperBackSwap.
rsadelle: (Default)
You may have noticed from my last couple of writing goals check-in posts that I haven't done any work on my book for a while. I hit a point where I feel paralyzed. My characters are going on a first date. I've never been on a date, so I have no idea how this should go: What do they talk about? When they leave together, do they take separate cars to one of the characters' houses or do they share a car, leaving one of them to take the other back to her car later? Part of my problem with this story in general is that I want it to be not terrible (really, I totally buy into the idea that erotica doesn't have to be perfect to sell) because the lesbian romances I've read are unbelievably bad. If this were a m/m novel, I would have no problem; I know the patterns for that, and I can write those kinds of stories all day long. But this. I feel like I'm floundering in a space where I have no examples, and I don't have the personal experience to draw from as a substitute. (Also, one of my characters has business ambitions, which I don't understand at all.) It seems like this should be easy anyway since it's just your standard marriage of convenience plot (think Jennifer Crusie's Strange Bedpersons and The Cinderella Deal), but somehow every time I think about, I get paralyzed all over again.

So, help? I don't know if I need ideas for what they can talk about or if I need suggestions of things to read that would help me learn the patterns or if I just need ideas of how to stop being afraid of it. I'll take whatever you've got.
rsadelle: (Default)
The Art of Detection is the last of Laurie R. King's Kate Martinelli books, and thank goodness. I really don't think I could have handled another one, but King is a compelling enough writer that her books are hard to put down.

Spoilers/Review )
rsadelle: (Default)
Night Work is the fourth of the Kate Martinelli mysteries. There is only one more book in the series, so I'll probably finish it off, but if there were more books, I would probably give up now.

Spoilers/Commentary )
rsadelle: (Default)
With Child is the third Kate Martinelli mystery. Given my experience with the last two, I saved this one for a Saturday morning when I could sit down and read the whole thing in one go without staying up past my bedtime.

Spoilers/Review )
rsadelle: (Default)
I liked Laurie King's A Grave Talent enough to request To Play the Fool from the library and give it a try. To Play the Fool falls into one of those categories that sometimes plague novels by people who are generally considered genre authors: it's a good book, but it's not a very good mystery novel.

Spoilers/Review )
rsadelle: (Default)
When I asked, both here and on Facebook, for lesbian fiction recs, Laurie King kept coming up as a suggestion. I don't read very many mysteries, although I read more when I was a teenager (my mother for a very long time read primarily mysteries with some literary fiction and poetry thrown in), but I was willing to give it a try.

The first two hundred pages of A Grave Talent are very good. It's an interesting mystery being worked on by interesting characters, primarily Kate Martinelli and Al Hawkins. The one quibble I have with that part of the book is that Kate's partner is referred to only by name - Lee - for 190 pages before King finally reveals that Lee is a woman. I find that kind of deliberate keeping the reader in the dark annoying, but I'm willing to let it pass in this instance since the book was written in 1993; I'm willing to accept that the world was a different place in the early 90s and this is one of the ways it was different.

I did not think as much of the next hundred and fifty pages. We find out who the murderer is on page 198, and the rest of the book is occupied with actually catching said criminal. But before we get to that, there is a whole bunch of artist as precious special snowflake nonsense, and yes, I do mean to be that derisive about it. Spoilers/Details )

All of that said, the mystery was very good, and I will probably read the next book.
rsadelle: (Default)
Malinda Lo's Huntress takes place in the same world as Ash (my review here), only several hundred years earlier.

Our main characters are Kaede and Taisin, students at The Academy, where girls go to learn to be sages. Taisin has never wanted anything but to be a sage. Kaede has never even managed the simplest blessing, but she doesn't want to go home to be married off for political advantage. The land is in a state of constant winter, and the king has been invited to visit the Fairy Queen. Instead, he sends his son, Con, along with Taisin, Kaede, and a small batch of guards, to accept her invitation.

Spoilers/Review )

My greatest wish is for Malinda Lo to be one of those writers who really learns to write by the third book. Ash and Huntress are both good, with moments that are exquisite, but I think Lo has the potential to be truly great.

If anyone wants to read Huntress, leave me a comment, and you can have my copy.
rsadelle: (Default)
I'd really like to read more lesbian fiction. I will take any and all recs, from any genre of professionally published work or fan fic. If you're reading this, there's a good chance you already know my tastes, but just in case you don't, a quick rundown of my recent-ish experience with lesbian profic: loved Malinda Lo's Ash and Huntress (review forthcoming) and all of Naomi Kritzer's work; hated Gerri Hill's The Killing Room and Karin Kallmaker's Substitute for Love; and am struggling my way through SteamPowered: Lesbian Steampunk Stories (although to be fair to the collection, I don't really like steampunk prose). Any suggestions?
rsadelle: (Default)
Remember a couple of entries ago when I said I needed a lot of words to talk about how bad the book I last read was? It took somewhere around 1500 words, which you can read here (note: the post includes spoilers, but you don't really want to read the book anyway) at [livejournal.com profile] romoerotic.
rsadelle: (Default)
I try to avoid spoilers for books I already know I want to read, and I knew I wanted to read Malinda Lo's Ash the first time I saw it on the shelf at Barnes & Noble. I did read the opening comments of at least two posts that said, "Everyone keeps saying they wish this was longer, and so do I." I'll say that too, and I have some ideas about how it could be longer.

But before I get to that, I will say that I loved this. It's essentially a Cinderella retelling, Spoilers )

I did buy the book (yay for multiple Barnes & Noble gift cards!), so if anyone wants to read it, let me know and you can have my copy.

Profile

rsadelle: (Default)
Ruth Sadelle Alderson

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags