rsadelle: (Default)
[personal profile] rsadelle
I read Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone today. Everyone's doing it. I can now go see the movie with my mother and not be confused. Plus, the good-looking lesbian I met last week told me I should. And so, in what is becoming my usual fashion, a pair of thoughts:

--I hope the movie is better than the book. J.K. Rowling spends seven chapters explaining things. I wanted to yell at her, "Show, don't tell!"

--No wonder people talk about George/Fred twincest. They're the most likable characters in the whole book, although Dumbledore is a close second.

Re: *very evil grin*

Date: 2002-01-12 08:33 am (UTC)
coneyislandbaby: (Default)
From: [personal profile] coneyislandbaby
Well, I think it all falls under the SBSW category. *shrug*

I'm sure the second one exists. I think I've read it.

That to me is a sign more of fanfic than of the story having a flaw. It's
something that seems to happen across fandoms in that one (often tiny or
insignificant) canon characteristic is blown up and becomes the defining
characteristic of the story, becoming much more exaggerated than it ever was in
canon.

I haven't read Telanu's stories yet *makes note to do so when I have a spare
minute*.

I liked Need a lot too.

BTW, which other pairings do you like/see in HP? I'm willing to give anything a
try, because there are a few pairings I never thought of that work really well for
me. I do have a teacher/student not-quite-squick (it's the below-squick thing for
me, as in it's not a squick, but if I were squicked it would be), but Harry/Snape doesn't get to me (as long as Harry's legal).

Profile

rsadelle: (Default)
Ruth Sadelle Alderson

Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags