Poll: Tags, Memories, and LJ Clients
Dec. 3rd, 2008 07:52 pmI've started relying more on people's tags to find their other fic and not bothering to go look at their memories. There are three reasons for this:
[Poll #1309064]
- So many people don't use memories anymore that looking for them just got to be an exercise in disappointment.
- When I find a piece of good fic via delicious, it's so easy to just click on the tags at the top of the entry to find the author's other, similar fic. (My most favorite tag ever is fic involving eating cake off of sammy; the more general fic involving cake is a close second.)
- LJ changed the profile page, and there's no longer a nice big, red heart to click on to get to people's memories. Sure, there's a link that says "Memories," but it's lumped in with a lot of other equally sized and formatted text.
- What about the nearly eight years of my entries that I've memorified? Obviously I'll go back and add tags to the fic entries. Do I go back and tag everything else that was memorified too?
- Do I keep adding things to memories or give that up in favor of only tagging them?
- Tags clearly serve the triple purpose of categorizing, commenting, and demonstrating cleverness. Do I stick to simple, descriptive tags, or go for more entertaining things?
- I've been using an extremely ancient client to post entries (LiveJournal 1.4.6), which comes from a time Before Tags and therefore has no way to add them to an entry. How should I post things now?
[Poll #1309064]
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 04:38 am (UTC)I would advise that for your commonly used tags, you go with simple things you will remember easily, so you don't end up with nearly duplicate tags. You can still have the occasional witty tag, but I imagine it's a real pain in the ass to remember the witty ones, and when you're posting from the LJ interface (which I do) it doesn't give you a drop-down list to select from. Of course, semagic or one of the popular LJ clients might, I don't know.
I wouldn't bother continuing to use memories, though. It's clear LJ is trying to phase that function out anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 05:41 am (UTC)I feel like tags are a different beast than memories, and I'm inclined to put more tags rather than fewer. (For example: I have a Harry Potter category of memories, but I can see further adding tags for pairings and discussion versus fic.)
I suppose I should have also posed this question: If I have a cleverer version of a simple tag, which one should I use? For example: ron/hermione or ron+hermione 4-evah!
And the other question I guess I could have asked: Should I dememorify all of the things that are currently memorified so everything is organized the same way?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 05:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 07:42 am (UTC)if yo ever decide to move memories to deli.icous I have a few tools for that.
back to tagging what we did for the vidding community is tag from x point forward and then made a master post for each category that links to the set of memories. that way clicking on the tags leads to the memories etc
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 04:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 04:24 pm (UTC)I don't know about using delicious. I find that other people's delicious accounts are sufficient for my fic finding needs, and I use my own bookmarks so little these days that they're not horribly important.
Hmmm. That's an interesting approach. I was thinking I would have more tags than memories (for example, I have a memory category for books, but for tags, I would probably have books, books: fiction, and books: nonfiction). I guess I could do some kind of master post and apply all possible tags to it.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 04:35 pm (UTC)creating one master post with tags is a way to go. but people will not be able to see the tags any better than they can see all the entries on the memories page. or a list of all your tags. you want to make it easy - I click on x tag and I see only x tagged posts. no hunting and pecking.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 04:59 pm (UTC)The more I think about this, the more I'm inclined to go back through and tag everything for completeness' sake.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 08:35 pm (UTC)Do you memory all your entries? Wow. That's very organized of you.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 08:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 09:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 09:13 pm (UTC)I actually do go back looking for things sometimes, and knowing what memory category they're likely to be in helps.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 09:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-06 05:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-08 08:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-09 03:45 am (UTC)